arQ
aı
legalaid · AI-native co-pilot for serious legal work

Research, draft, and reviewwith a co-pilot that cites every step.

arQai legalaid weaves together judgments, statutes, and your private knowledge into a governed workspace – so every answer, draft, and summary is anchored in verifiable law.

Designed for Indian and common-law workflows
Private by design · HttpOnly sessions · audit trails

Research workspaceLive · synced to judgments

Query0.8s
How have Indian courts interpreted Section 34 in the context of delayed arbitral awards in infrastructure disputes?

Answer overview

  • Grounded in 12 Supreme Court & 34 HC matters
  • Breaks down ratio vs. obiter with citations
  • Exports to memo, note, or email format
Matters accelerated240+
Avg. time saved / matter3.8h
Citation coverage1950 – 2025
How it works

From raw judgments to reasoned, cite-ready output

The co-pilot wraps cutting-edge AI research in a workflow designed for legal teams – not generic chatbots.

Ingest knowledge

Securely connect judgments, statutes, internal notes, and DMS repositories into a governed knowledge graph.

Ask complex questions

Query in natural language and get grounded answers with pinpoint citations and paragraph-level references.

Draft & review

Generate arguments, redlines, and briefing notes with side-by-side comparison against your existing drafts.

Explain & justify

Trace reasoning, inspect sources, and export clean explanation memos for partners and clients.

Deep AI + legal integration

More than chat: a governed workspace for your legal stack

Connect case law, statutes, research notes, and internal DMS into a single, queryable surface with controllable data flows.

  • Native support for Indian Supreme & High Court judgments, with expansion paths for other common-law jurisdictions.
  • Document-aware drafting that respects your firm playbooks and partner preferences.
  • First-class support for citations, paragraph anchors, and reasoning traces – ready to paste into memos and notes.
matter / Infra dispute – Section 34
Judgment viewExtracted from PDF
Para 34 The Court notes that delays attributable solely to the employer cannot, by themselves, justify setting aside an award absent perversity or patent illegality in the reasoning...
Highlighted by co-pilot · linked to 3 similar matters

Insights & reasoning trace

1. The Court treats delay as a factual matrix rather than an independent ground under Section 34.

2. The award survives where the tribunal has accounted for delay in its reasoning, even if parties disagree with the quantum.

3. The co-pilot suggests citing XYZ Infra v. State (2022) and ABC Constructions v. NHAI (2024) to strengthen the proposition.

Firm knowledge baseRAG + fine-tuned models
Use-case highlights

Built for litigation, transactions, and in-house teams

Start with high-leverage workflows that move the needle for your practice – then expand into deeper automation over time.

Case prep & research

Surface relevant precedents, pinpoint ratios, and conflicting views in minutes instead of hours.

6 hr → 2 hr per matter

Contract review & redlining

Compare clauses against playbooks, flag deviations, and draft redlines aligned with your risk profile.

Up to 58% less review time

Compliance & policy checks

Scan documents against regulatory frameworks and internal policies across jurisdictions.

Better managed risk exposure

Client-ready summaries

Turn dense documents into crisp, audience-specific summaries ready for partner or client review.

4× faster client updates
Trust, governance & security

Your matters stay your matters

Bring AI into your practice without compromising confidentiality, privilege, or compliance obligations.

  • Private deployments in your VPC or on-prem with strict network boundaries.
  • Granular access control, workspace-level permissions, and retention policies.
  • Guardrails to require citations for critical flows, with human-in-the-loop review.
  • Detailed audit log of prompts, actions, and outputs for governance and training.

Governance snapshot

Designed for internal policies and regulatory expectations.

Deployment modeVPC / on-prem
Data residencyIndia or region of choice
Access modelSSO, SAML, role-based
Audit coveragePrompts, actions & exports
Built with guardrails to keep sensitive data within your control.

"The co-pilot has changed the tempo of our work – research notes that took half a day now land with citations and reasoning in under an hour."

General Counsel, technology company

50%

Faster document review

4×

More client-ready outputs

99%

Accuracy & compliance

Pricing & plans

Start focused, scale with your practice

Begin with a pilot for a small team, then expand into firm-wide deployment once workflows are proven.

Solo / Boutique

For individual practitioners and small, focused teams.

₹ X,XXX

per user / month, billed annually

  • Unlimited research queries
  • Up to 100 AI-drafted documents / month
  • Secure, India-hosted cloud deployment
  • Email support and onboarding checklist

Law FirmsRecommended

For multi-partner firms with complex workflows and teams.

Let's talk

volume pricing available

  • Team workspaces and shared knowledge libraries
  • Advanced workflows (approvals, checklists, playbooks)
  • On-prem / VPC deployment options
  • Dedicated success manager & priority support

In-house Teams

For corporate legal and general counsel teams.

Custom

based on region & integrations

  • Integrations with internal tools (DMS, ticketing, ERP)
  • Tailored policy & contract libraries
  • Granular access control and audit logs
  • Executive-grade reporting and analytics

Bring an AI co-pilot into your legal stack

See a live walkthrough on your own matters. We will help you scope a pilot that respects privilege, governance, and your team's way of working.